Free, Fair and Alive
*- URL
- https:://freefairandalive.org
- Subtitle
- The insurgent power of the commons
- Authors
- David Bollier / Silke Helfrich
I read it in 2021. I loved it.
Partly as it draws threads between topics of great interest to me - commons, complexity science, commons-public partnerships, digital commons, patterns. It even ticked my wiki box.
It's also a very practical manifesto for political / social organising. I really like this about it. Its feel like a guidebook to (one form of) Anti-capitalism.
As they say:
this book is not just to illuminate new patterns of thought and feeling, but to offer a guide to action.
It also full of real-world examples of commoning already in action.
Since reading it I'm dipping back in to it and looking at the specific patterns and ideas in more depth. The pattern-style they use makes it really usable. See Triad of Commoning.
It has three main parts:
- part 1, discussing the commons and commoning and what they are and their insurgent potential.
- part 2, outlining a whole bunch of patterns for commoning that you might use. See Triad of Commoning.
- part 3, about how to grow the Commonsverse and challenge the hegemonic power.
Some sections I particularly liked:
- A Platform Designed for Collaboration: Federated Wiki
- Complexity Science and Commoning
- The Nested-I and Ubuntu Rationality: The Relational Ontology of the Commons
1. Discussion
1.1. How does it relate to Ostrom / Governing the Commons?
Not a reinterpretation - but a shifted orientation, yes. Subtitle of FFA is "the insurgent power of the commons". Ostrom is certainly not insurgent! Somewhat propertarian in her basic framing, akin to 'Austrian' economics (Hayek etc). Whereas FFA is counter-enclosure, counter-extractivism, post-propertarian. Hence common-ING as its pivot, the radical, situated practice, rather than commonS, the co-optable, abstract, political-economic form.
– @mikehales - https://social.coop/@mike_hales/106280463656699063
2. How it was written
I found it great to discover that this book was researched and composed using FedWiki.
3. What's the title about?
This is reflected in our title, which describes the foundation, structure, and vision of the commons: Free, Fair and Alive. Any emancipation from the existing system must honor freedom in the widest human sense, not just libertarian economic freedom of the isolated individual. It must put fairness, mutually agreed upon, at the center of any system of provisioning and governance. And it must recognize our existence as living beings on an Earth that is itself alive.
Bit of similarity to Doughnut Economics there - free and fair is a bit like the social foundation, alive is a bit like the avoidance of planetary overshoot.
4. Quotes
You will find many quotes from FFA dotted around my wiki. Check out the backlinks.
4.1. Unfiled
What we really need today is creative experimentation and the courage to initiate new patterns of action. We need to learn how to identify patterns of cultural life that can bring about change, notwithstanding the immense power of capital.
The new structure can help us envision different sorts of community, social practices, and economic institutions — and above all, a new culture that honors cooperation and sharing.
We came to realize that if we aspire to social and political transformation but try to do so using the language of market economics, state power, and political liberalism, we will fail.
5. Elsewhere
5.1. In my garden
Notes that link to this note (AKA backlinks).
- The commons enables people to assert sovereignty without nationalism
- Beating the bounds
- The commons enables people to enjoy freedom without repressing others
- How I take notes
- Enclosure
- Unitierra
- Commons
- Culture and structure
- Collaborative financing
- What is the relationship between cooperatives and the commons?
- complexity science
- commons-public partnerships
- 2021-05-16
- Cultivate Shared Purpose and Values
- The Patterning Instinct
- Innovation
- Development
- Cultural hegemony
- semi-permeable membrane
- Provisioning
- Digital commons
- Anarchist Cybernetics
- 2022-03-06
- distributed ledgers and commoning
- 2021-08-24
- Tools for Conviviality
- Ritualize Togetherness
- Who creates commons-public partnerships?
- EnCommuns
- Patterns vs principles
- A Platform Designed for Collaboration: Federated Wiki
- Beyond the horizontal and the vertical
- Some books I've read
- 2021-05-29
- 2021-07-03
- Commoning is based on a very different ontology from capitalism
- social contract
- Triad of Commoning
- Holochain
- Goteo
- Repair Cafe
- A drift in the gardens
- 2022-01-30
- public-private partnerships
- OntoShift
- Evo Morales
- Comparing liberatory technology and convivial tools
- Contribute Freely
- Blockchain for the political left
- 2021-11-17
- Newsletter: June 2023
- pluriverse
- 2021-06-12
- Patterns of Commoning
- Money-lite commoning
- mutualization
- Rely on Distributed Structures
- School
- Patterns
- The commons enables people to foster togetherness without compulsion
- How We Show Up with Mia Birdsong
- Scarcity
- gift economy
- Peer Governance
- commoning
- Consent
- 2021-05-13
- What do I think about the Agora?
- Convivial tools
- The commons enables people to enact fairness without bureaucratic control
- State power
- The Nested-I and Ubuntu Rationality: The Relational Ontology of the Commons
- David Bollier
- My garden circles
- Relational ontology
- Commoner vs Citizen
- 2022-12-26
- 2022-01-20
- Ownership
- Choose Commons-Friendly Financing
- Participation
- Comparing FedWiki and Agora
- commoner
- Value flows
- A commons is a politics of belonging
- Sociocracy
- Heterarchy
- 2021-11-20
- Fab Lab
- local currency
- Complexity and the left
- Complexity Science and Commoning
- 2021-05-15
- Holochain and commoning
- Distributed ledger
- 2021-06-06
- Creatively Adapt & Renew
- Commoning represents a profound challenge to capitalism
- Well-connected
- Capitalism
- Tragedy of the Commons
- 2021-05-22
- 2021-05-19
- Deepen Communion with Nature
- Open Building Institute
- Agroecology
- Federated Wiki
- Ubuntu Rationality