Digital Ecosocialism: Breaking the power of Big Tech

Outlines the current weak reformist approaches that we should avoid.

Progressive criticisms of the tech sector are often drawn from a mainstream capitalist framework centered around antitrust, human rights and worker well-being.

• Anti-trust and big tech
• intellectual property

The likes of Google, Amazon, Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Netflix, Nvidia, Intel, AMD and many other firms are so big because they own the intellectual property and means of computation that is used across the world.

Instead of opposing Big Tech corporations in principle, European policymakers are opportunists seeking to expand their own portion of the pie.

Other proposed reformist capitalist measures, such as progressive taxation, the development of new technology as a public option, and worker protections still fail to address root causes and core problems.

Progressive digital capitalism is better than neoliberalism. But it is nationalist in orientation, cannot prevent digital colonialism, and it retains a commitment to private property, profit, accumulation and growth.

Outlines how big tech is complicit in climate change and other ecological destructions.

Other major blindspots for digital reformists are the twin crises of climate change and ecological destruction that imperil life on Earth.

Degrowth must be implemented in the immediate future. Slight reforms to capitalism touted by progressives will still destroy the environment. Applying the precautioonary principle, we cannot afford to risk a permanent ecological catastrophe. The tech sector is not a bystander here, but now one of the leading drivers of these trends.

(Big tech is complicit in climate breakdown)

According to a recent report, in 2019, digital technologies — defined as telecommunications networks, data centers, terminals (personal devices) and IoT (internet of things) sensors — contributed 4 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, and its energy use has increased by 9 percent per year.

^ worth double checking that report.

Interesting also to see digital technologies defined as "telecommunications networks, data centers, terminals (personal devices) and IoT (internet of things) sensors"

Companies like Apple claim to be “carbon-neutral” by 2030, but this “currently includes only direct operations, which account for a microscopic 1.5 percent of its carbon footprint.”

• Mining for minerals used in electronics is often ecologically destructive
• Digital companies support other forms of unsustainable extraction

resource use tracks tightly to GDP growth across history

Researchers recently found that shifting economic activity to services, including knowledge-intensive industries, has limited potential to reduce global environmental impacts due to the increase in levels of household consumption by service workers.

If capitalism is ecologically unsustainable, then digital policies must accommodate this stark and challenging reality.

• Digital Socialism
  • existing examples
    • Libre software
    • Creative Commons
    • data commons like DECODE
    • Platform coops
    • Alternative social media such as the Fediverse
  • policy support is needed
  • socialisation of infrastructure
• The Digital Tech Deal
  • part of a planned transition from digital capitalism to digital socialism

Big Tech corporations, intellectual property and private ownership of the means of computation are deeply embedded into the digital society, and cannot be turned off overnight. Thus, to replace digital capitalism with a socialist model, we need a planned transition to digital socialism.

Environmentalists have proposed new “deals” outlining the transition to a green economy. Reformist proposals like the US Green New Deal and European Green Deal operate within a capitalist framework that retains the harms of capitalism, such as terminal growth, imperialism and structural inequality.

However, neither these red nor green deals incorporate plans for the digital ecosystem, despite its central relevance to the modern economy and environmental sustainability. In turn, the digital justice movement has almost entirely ignored degrowth proposals and the need to integrate their assessment of the digital economy into an ecosocialist framework. Environmental justice and digital justice go hand-in-hand, and the two movements must link up to achieve their goals.

• Digital Tech Deal
  • values: Anti-imperialism, sustainability, social justice, worker empowerment, democratic control, class abolition
  • principles:
    • keep digital economy within social and planetary boundaries
    • phase out intellectual property
    • socialise physical infrastructure
    • replace private investment of production with public subsidies and production
    • decentralise the internet
    • socialise the platforms
    • socialise digital intelligence and data
    • ban forced advertising and platform consumerism
    • Replace military, police, prisons and national security apparatuses with community-driven safety and security services
    • end the digital divide

Transition.

Education.

First, it is essential to raise awareness, promote education and exchange ideas within and across communities so together we can co-create a new framework for the digital economy. In order to do this, a clear critique of digital capitalism and colonialism is needed.

Networks/organisation.

Second, we need to connect digital justice movements with other social, racial and environmental justice movements.

Agitation

Third, we need to ramp up direct action and agitation against Big Tech and the US empire.

Cooperative economy

Fourth, we must work to build tech worker cooperatives that can be the building blocks for a new digital socialist economy.

Build alternatives

we should aim to abolish Big Tech and the system of digital capitalism altogether. And this will require building alternatives, engaging with tech workers, not to reform the unreformable, but to help work out a just transition for the industry.

Tech professionals work with wider society

Finally, people from all walks of life should work collaboratively with tech professionals to develop the concrete plan that would make up a Digital Tech Deal. This needs to be taken as seriously as current green “deals” for the environment. With a Digital Tech Deal, some workers — such as those in the advertisement industry — would lose their jobs, so there would have to be a just transition for workers in these industries. Workers, scientists, engineers, sociologists, lawyers, educators, activists and the general public could collectively brainstorm how to make such a transition practical.

Not too different from resist, regulate, recode then.