As a statement: Technology should be liberatory.
So what is liberatory technology?
I suppose a big piece of the definition is, what is your definition of liberation?
From reading Towards a Liberatory Technology, the vibe I get is:
- technology should reduce toil
- technology should function in harmony with nature
- technology should facilitate community and reduce alienation
I'm down with all of that.
I mean in some senses that makes me think of doughnut economics - helping to meet social foundation while staying within ecological boundaries. A liberatory technology would be one that keeps us in the doughnut.
Liberatory technology as per Bookchin, I think, has the extra additional proviso of small scale, localised, and decentralised. I'm fine with that too - but I imagine it's probably the area that would have the most contention. As in - reducing toil, not wrecking the planet, I imagine most people can get on board with that. Whether you can succeed best with decentralisation or state coordination you're going to get discussion.
Technology would be used for the purpose of eliminating toil and drudgery, and labor-saving techniques would be applied so as to minimize the amount of necessary work for everyone.
The Communalism Pamphlet goes in to a bit of detail on ways technology could be liberatory with regards to:
2. See also
- Compare with things like appropriate technology, tech for good, Convivial Tools, etc.
- Fields, Factories and Workshops | The Anarchist Library
- Towards Liberatory Technology | Black Star Tech Group
- fully automated luxury communism
3.1. In my garden
Notes that link to this note (AKA backlinks).
- Technology should be liberatory
- What do I think about the Agora?
- Flancia Collective
- Comparing liberatory technology and appropriate technology
- Comparing liberatory technology and convivial tools
- Discrimination in digital finance
- Towards a Liberatory Technology
- The role of technology in eco-socialism
- Liberatory software